Contents
- Northwest America was buried in an ancient flood
- They can’t tell you by who, how and when Seattle was built
- Native Americans are Tartarians
- Seattle was excavated
- Old pictures of Seattle, Tacoma and Olympia
- Secret Societies of the Wild West
Northwest America was buried in an ancient flood
During the early era of Hollywood, native Americans were portrayed as violent savages, plundering the white man’s resources, raping their women and breaking treaty agreements. In late Hollywood, the opposite is shown: Now the natives are peace-loving, spiritually attuned people, always humble, who are victimized, tortured and killed by the evil white man.
Consider that both these views are far off the mark. Two veils that cover our real History.
I submit that Seattle was not built by European settlers in the late 1800s. It was perhaps built by the Mongolian-Tartarian people who controlled an empire that today encompasses China, Russia, western Canada, western USA and maybe more. A technologically advanced empire that was defeated through wars from the air and floods. An empire whose History has been erased. The defeated people later became the “indigenous” around the world.
I assert Seattle was originally a city that covered a much larger area, encompassing what is today known as Olympia, Tacoma and Seattle in Washington State. This is why the cityscape stretches all the way from Seattle to Olympia, continuously for a 100 miles. It was dressed in the same super-architecture we find around the world, an architecture foreign to the wooden-hut building settlers.
The “mythology” of the native Duwamish people, confirms:
Elip Tilikum, the “First People,” a race of giants whose actions defined a pre-human mythic world.
Water covered the country. It washed away the country. Many people were drifting about… Muskrat was on a stick, very sad.” Their world had been drowned in a great flood. “The little birds, Beaver, Land-otter, and the fishes, all the people, wished to get land from below.” This world had been preceded by two eras destroyed by fire and by disease. Now the third world had been drowned. “Beaver went down [below the flood]. He could not get land.” Birds fly in the sky, fishes swim in the sea, but landed folk like Beaver and Land Otter looked to little Muskrat to save them. “You try: if you find land below, you get it.”
Source: https://www.postalley.org/2021/01/17/beginnings-the-mythic-origins-of-puget-sound-people/
Doesn’t that sound exactly like hundreds of other indigenous “myths”? Doesn’t that explain why, on old maps, northwestern America is labeled “land of Giants” and why it’s flooded on other maps?
Even the name of the “first people” is consistent with what I’ve shared in my books: Elip Tililkum is ancient German. El-Ip T Eli-Kum. The people of El, the people coming from Eli – a term for God, found around the world.
Wikipedia tells us this little tidbit about the “History of the Duwamish”:
In the year 1700, a massive earthquake shook the Northwest Coast, felt as far away as Japan. The quake resulted in a large tsunami which struck the coastline. This event is recorded in Duwamish oral history, in which Thunderbird participated in an ancient battle, shaking the ground and “rolling up” the waters
The massive global flood events are recorded in all cultures. It’s not just a local Tsunami, it’s one of the major flood events that buried the cities of the American west.
If you recall my previous article about the Dakota Badlands, you know that Thunderbird shot fire out of the sky to melt entire cities. Now Thunderbird is at it again in Seattle.
Thunderbird is the flying device that waged war against the natives from the air.
They can’t tell you by who, how and when Seattle was built
Let’s have a peek at the official mainstream narrative:
Isn’t it strange how these timelines never include the History of the natives? You’re supposed to believe that nothing of note happened before European settlers arrived. Before that, they were nothing more than dust-pounding hunter-gatherers for 100 000 years.
According to the timeline above, Seattle had a population of only 300 in the 1850s.
The Wikipedia page “Demographics of Seattle”shows even less in 1860: Only 188 people!
It’s therefore odd that a 1858 map of the area shows a detailed survey-grid corresponding with Seattle, Olympia, Tacoma and other tows.
A close up of the Seattle grid:
History books say that Seattle was founded in 1865 and first “incorporated” in 1869. So what’s the label “Seattle” doing on a 1858 map?
Was the name given to the cartographer by natives? Maybe.
Olympia was an even larger grid:
You could argue that these are surveying lines to plan where to build. But the “Klondike gold-rush” didn’t start until 8 years later.
I’ve previously shown how grand architecture in Helena, Montana, San Fransisco and other places is explained by “gold rush” – people rushing to dig for gold. The same excuse is provided for Seattle – a city built from nothing, within a few years, “because of the gold rush”.
Historians claim that the building of Seattle coincided with the Klondike gold rush. But Klondike was in Dawson city, Canada. That’s 2000 miles far away from Seattle, at the border to Alaska. Historians say “well, it’s because there was a route to Klondike, through Seattle”. But they also say that “only few got rich, most people dug for gold in vain”. So it’s doubtful that the gold rush in Klondike had anything to do with wealth in Seattle.
According to the map, the city was either already standing or being planned long before the gold rush. I believe it was already standing hundreds of years prior.
Olympia still looks like a grid today, like so many American cities (and unlike European cities that have a lot of curves, circles, triangles, rectangles, etc. in their streets:
Seattle is also still a grid:
Foreigners who visit America are always puzzled at how straight streets are, especially in the West. They go on and on in a straight line, regardless of natural features. We’ve seen in previous articles evidence that these grids were already there before the settlers built their cities.
There is a webpage featuring municipal maps of Seattle. My screenshot shows that at one time, maps from the 1790s and 1840s were offered. But when I click, it says the items can no longer be found. Whoever removed the items, forgot to remove the filter-index.
Why would they be removed? Because it doesn’t sync with Seattle History starting in 1850?
At the library of Congress I did find one map of the area, published in 1798 in London:
The timeline saying Seattle started in 1851 can’t be correct. We already have detailed maps in the 1700s and the places are already named in English. The Terrain is detailed and accurate. It’s difficult to understand how this was mapped without an airplane or other high-tech means.
The map was made by George Vancouver who apparently died in 1798, the year the map was published. But Mr. Vancouver had only ships at his disposal. As far as I can tell he did not have satellites or access to Google Maps.
But the map doesn’t show any of the larger cities I claim existed. In my view, they are buried. A flood that moved landmasses. The cities were excavated from below the ground from the 1830s onwards.
We see a lot of ports on this map. Port Susan, Port Discovery, Port Hudson, Port Orlund, Port Wilson and more. The Dictionary tells us that a port is “a maritime facility comprising of one or more wharves or loading areas, where ships load and discharge cargo and passengers”. Even after wading through mainstream sources it’s not clear to me why there should be so many ports with English names in lands inhabited by native “Indians”.
Wikipedia tells me that “for centuries, the Duwamish people lived in 17 towns around Seattle”. These towns are omitted on the map. Why? Some Historians have suggested it’s because Mr. Vancouver didn’t dare go on land, so he doesn’t know the locations and sizes of native American towns. But if Vancouver never ventured on land, how did he know the terrain so well?
The only large building mentioned in the timeline prior to 1875 is the “Washington Territorial University”, built in 1861. So when exactly was this large city supposed to have been built?
I continue down the timeline but still find no answer:
In 1889 Seattle is suddenly referred to as a city, but the only mentions of buildings are two opera houses. Am I missing something here? Some time between 1875 and 1890, Seattle must have seen the largest construction project in the northwestern Americas, but History makes no mention of it.
The historical timeline of Seattle apparently has no place for the magnificent, superhuman feat of building this large city. Researchers are asking questions (this article was in fact inspired by these questions):
See thread by @TartariaLives HERE.
In 1889 we have “The Great Seattle Fire”. If you’ve read my articles on Chicago, San Francisco, Melbourne and other places, you see they used the same pattern and same script everywhere to burn down the old world. While newspaper articles of the era speak about how a city was burned to the ground, they make no mention of how it was built.
Some of the majestic architecture was supposed to have been built for the “Exposition of 1909” after which they were destroyed. This one was allegedly built for the Expo:
The idea for the exposition came from a man by the name of Godfrey Chealander, a member of a semi-secret society called “The Arctic Brotherhood”. According to their website, every gold-mining town in the west had a chapter of this fraternal organization.
I’ve already elaborated on the “exposition hoax” elsewhere. I don’t believe these buildings were built for the expo. They were excavated, featured one last time, then destroyed. The intention was to eradicate the memory of the old world so that they could create a new one according to their ideas.
The “Communist Revolutions” of the 20th Century that destroyed millions of old buildings were a continuation of a great reset that had been raging since the 1700s. Their reason for destroying everything was to get people to envision what can be, unburdened by what has been. But the world they’ve created doesn’t seem all that appealing and many are hoping that one day, the Tartarian Empire strikes back.
Native Americans are Tartarians
The navy at the opening ceremony of the Expo. Notice the pillar lined with swastikas.
The swastika is a common native-American symbol. It’s also common in Tibet, Mongolia and India. Before the 1930s it had nothing to do with Nazis.
There are numerous connections between Mongolians, indigenous Siberians (which are both Tartarians according to old maps) and native Americans.
They also look alike:
If I had presented this to you without caption, you probably couldn’t tell if she is Asian or native American.
Old world maps show there used to be passage between Siberia and Alaska. (Casa Degli Atellani – Milan – Italy)
Not that they needed the passage, being competent seafarers.
Canada, Northwestern U.S., Russia, Mongolia and northern China all used to belong to Tartaria – so say the maps. This is why western Canada and Northwestern U.S. used to be shown as “Unknown Lands”. They weren’t unknown, but they were controlled by “the enemy”.
The photo below shows Siberian Inuit Eskimos who were shipped to the 1909 Expo.
The official Emblem of the Expo, symbolizing the exchange between an Asian woman and a White woman.
Quote:
“Duwamish society was divided into an upper class, lower class, and slave class. Each of these classes were largely hereditary, although social movement did happen. Nobility was based on impeccable genealogy, inter-tribal kinship, wise use of resources, and possession of esoteric knowledge about the workings of spirits and the spirit world, making an effective marriage of class, secular, religious, and economic power. There were physical distinctions for high-status individuals: mothers carefully shaped the heads of their young babies, binding them with cradle boards just long enough to produce a steep sloping forehead”.
My point? We find similar customs and beliefs around the world, including Siberia and Mongolia. According to an article on Artificial Cranial Deformation this was mainly practiced by “Eurasian Tribes” as well as Native Americans. People with elongated heads were considered “higher class” in an ancient three-class caste system. Elongated heads have been associated with “the gods”.
Modern elites are still fond of the long-heads. (Photo: Lynn de Rothschild beside long-head sculpture).
Seattle was excavated
I visited the website of the Library of Congress and searched in their newspaper archives for “Washington” State, 1860 to 1900, keyword “excavation”.
I got back 3281 results!
Despite the press – even back then – being tightly controlled and steered toward fake History. Many of the results were offers or ads for excavation. Despite being a fairly small town, excavation was all the rage in early Seattle. A sample from 13th September, 1890, from the Seattle Intelligencer:
The snippet also uses the word “grading”. This word means the leveling of an area through the removal of hills, elevations and dirt or the addition of such.
These are some images of late 1800s and early 1900s Seattle which show evidence of excavation.
The fact of excavation is proven by the lack of vegetation from the dirt. If this hill had seen any sunlight, you’d see grass, plants, bushes and trees growing on it.
You’re asked to believe that these three buildings and hundreds like it, were built using horse carriages. Where did the stone and brick come from? Of the 3000 inhabitants, how many were able-bodied men, capable of construction? Let’s say half of them were women. That leaves us with 1500. Let’s say half of those were children or elderly. That leaves us with 750. Let’s generously assume only half of those had other jobs or were busy with gold digging. That leaves us with a few hundred.
“But they had gold! They could afford to employ outside help!”
OK. Fair enough. From where? At around the same time, hundreds of other towns in the west were miraculously developing at breakneck speed. Surely the masons were busy building their own cities and had no time to lend Seattle a hand.
I found no Hollywood movie that references these massive construction undertaking. Almost every movie promotes the cowboy and Indian narrative exclusively.
“Tearing down the hills”? The postcard speaks for itself. Hills were torn down because Seattle was not built, it was excavated!
If it had been built, we’d know when, how, where, who built the city.
I came across this item of a company advertising for “odorless excavation”. Apparently excavating the buried city caused a lot of bad smells.
Mainstream historians refer to the excavation of Seattle as “regrading”. They love using deceptive labels to reframe what was actually going on. From Wikipedia:
“The topography of central Seattle was radically altered by a series of regrades in the city’s first century of urban settlement, in what might have been the largest such alteration of urban terrain at the time.
…
Seattle’s first 58 regrades consisted largely of cutting the tops off high places and dumping the dirt into low places and onto the beach
So rather than “Seattle was excavated” they say “Seattle was re-levelled”. A re-wording however does not change the facts.
Old pictures of Seattle, Tacoma and Olympia
A bird’s eye view of the Exposition:
The poster tells us this is an “authorized view”. I wonder what the unauthorized ones look like.
Today the area is the campus of University of Washington. I haven’t taken time to look into this, but I have a hunch that not all buildings were removed from the expo and some of them are now parts of the University campus. Because 99% of the people believe whatever they are told by “the authorities”, it would have been very easy to repurpose the buildings.
The Expo:
But we don’t even need the alleged “expo built buildings” to prove a point. This is the old Seattle Public Library:
It was said to have been built in two years, completed in 1906 but I found no construction plans or photos.
And who built all this?
And this:
The Census counts 3500 people in 1880. That’s an impressive amount of schools for what wouldn’t be more than a few hundred kids.
This is the city of Tacoma in the 1893:
The building on the left is topped by Griffin statues. The left building has arched entrances. All built by those horse and carriage riding, lasso-waving, wooden-church-building cowboys.
For contrast, this is how settlers actually built their houses (Seattle 1860):
Also Tacoma 1893:
The scene, in and of itself is nothing special. Until you realize that thousands of towns across the “wild west” looked like this. Who built it all? Why does it look so very unlike the wooden-shed style they normally used?
Old Tacoma looks like medieval Europe:
Let’s have a look at Olympia, the Capital of Washington Territory since 1853.
The Capitol Building, allegedly built in the late between 1911 and 1928.
The “old capitol building of Olympia”, supposedly built in 1892 (just like hundreds of thousands of other buildings that also happened to be built in 1892 – what a year that must have been, the Giza Pyramids are nothing in comparison to thousands of buildings like this within just a few years):
Other photos show that the building may have been larger at one time:
If it makes little sense to you that one capitol was built in 1892 and then another one built a few years later, I’m with you.
To be fair, there are construction photos of the newer Capitol building. But I found none of any other grand buildings.
The tower of the old Capitol caught fire in 1928 and had to be removed.
The post office of Olympia is exactly what you’d expect from the outermost frontiers of the wild west, is it not?
Contrast this with the first schoolhouse built in Olympa in 1852:
They were barely capable of building a house with a level roof or even uni-sized windows. And these same settlers also built the Greek-style super-structures?
Alt-history researchers have wondered about the large “mental asylums” around these places in the 1800s. There were several around Seattle, Tacoma and Olympia. Is this where they locked people up if that didn’t buy into the historical lies?
Secret Societies of the Wild West
Another oddity of the 1800s is that we saw more secret societies and fraternities than ever before or after. I’ve already mentioned the Arctic Brotherhood which had a chapter in every gold-mining location of “the West”.
“The West” we keep talking about, by the way, is the place where population density suddenly drops, due to the arid desert lands of these formerly fertile places:
Another example, of hundreds, is a secret society called E Clampus Vitus. I quote Wikipedia:
The Ancient and Honorable Order of E Clampus Vitus (ECV) is a fraternal organization dedicated to the preservation of the heritage of the American West, especially the history of the Mother Lode and gold mining regions of the area.
…
When a stranger came to town, Clampers would inform him that to do business in the town it was essential to join the local secret society.
Why are secret societies overseeing gold mining?
The mid 1800s saw all these “gold rushes” and then, just like that, they all subsided and never came back. How probable is that?
More likely, we aren’t looking at “gold rushes” but rather, massive excavation projects and lootings from the buried old world. Hence the need for all these secretive, oath-swearing, consequence-threatening secret clubs.
Check out this magnificent 1903 postcard of Olympia:
It tells us that the “new state capitol” is what Wikipedia calls “the old state capitol”. Across from it, to the right there is another massive building. What is it?
I checked on Google Maps and find it’s at the same location that the Capitol building would be built and completed decades later. See the two red pins here:
Something was already there in 1905. So perhaps the Capitol wasn’t built when they said it was and the construction photos I found, are merely photos of additions being built or refurbishments.
The postcard also reveals that a building with four stone columns – the masonic temple – was built in 1852. An example of just how quickly a secret society was established in Olympia.
Seriously: Olympia was barely established or populated in 1852, according to historians, but there’s already a secret society operating?I find the word “freemasons” intriguing in the context of the worldwide, post-flood excavation. A mason is someone who builds buildings. But what is a free-mason? Someone who lets buildings magically appear by freeing them from the dirt and mud? Was that the real purpose of all these lodges that sprang up in the 1800s?
The postcard also shows an Oddfellows hall, yet another secret society. We’re looking at a place that had no more than a few hundred inhabitants but I already count four secret societies without even actively having looked for them. I have no doubt there are more.
There must have been a lot to keep secret in the wild west.