Table of Contents
1. Geoglyphs
2. Grids
3. Balbal Statues
4. Valley of Balls
5. Melted Cities
6. Tartaria Disappeared
7. Akmola
8. Almaty
Geoglyphs
Browsing Google Earth got me curious about Kazakhstan. I found a landscape of geoglyphs and grids that are only seen from high in the air.
Who drew this gigantic swastika into the ground? When? Why?
The Kazakhs have no answer to such a simple question. If you don’t know who altered your land in the most incredible way, perhaps it’s because your History has been erased.
AI (Google, Wikipedia, Mainstream intel) tells you this:
And what about this Kazakhstan pentagram? The so-called Lisakovsk Pentagram pentagram lies in a region of almost no population but plenty of archaeological ruins. The object measures 1200 feet (366 meters). Today the area is overgrown and unused and has been since Soviet times.
Amazingly, it was first noted not by local people on the ground, but by Googe Earth users in 2007! Locals had no clue it exists until these aerial images emerged. An article on NBC news has this “explanation”:
‘Emma Usmanova, an archaeologist with years of experience working in the Lisakovsk area, has an answer. “It is the outline of a park made in the form of a star,” Usmanova told LiveScience’.
Wow! Really? The article does not mention who made it, when it was made and why.
There are several crosses as well, some are said to be thousands of years old. This is one of them:
And here’s a square that is barely visible anymore. It hints at an object having stood there at some point, or being overgrown and underground. Or perhaps stamped into the landscape. We notice that the “stamping tool” is round.
One of several random giant circles, again made by something round:
Grids
As elsewhere, there’s a mysterious collection of perfectly aligned landscape grids spanning hundreds, in some places even thousands of miles. Look more closely to see it, much of it is already overgrown:
Close up:
If you’re standing on one of these grid lines on the ground it looks like just another dirt road. Only from the air can one see that it’s a large grid system. Who made it? Why? The authorities are silent on this.
The grid is continuous, regardless of terrain or elevation. This is not how humans normally build roads, much less in the middle of nowhere. Roads are built around natural features.
As elsewhere, we also find that modern highways are built along ancient straight lines:
If you look closely you’ll also find another cross stamped into the landscape here in the image above.
I’ve previously shown modern highways built along ancient ones in the United States. Our grandparents acknowledged this strange fact. I have a 1930s postcard of California that proves it:
And yet, we are told that the ancient indigenous of the land didn’t build highways because they were primitive hunter-gatherer nomads.
Anyone who simply browses Google Earth Kazakhstan for a while, is bound to come up with some anomaly. You don’t have to go looking for it with a magnifying glass, it jumps out at you.
One thought that comes to mind: “Ancient high-tech mining/harvesting”.
Another thought: “Ancient energy grid”.
Most of these grids are in uninhabited no-mans-land.
A grid near the town of Semey:
The surrounding areas is what normal farmland looks like, separated into lots of different sizes and colors. The grid is not farming land. The above screenshot points to the possibility that at one time, the entire land was marked with this grid which has been covered with earth or a mudflood. The grid likely continues below but is concealed from view due to the soil covering it.
Close-up:
Balbal Statues
Kazakhstan is also strewn with statues, but the people don’t remember who built them.
The stone statues are called “Balbal” and there are thousands of them in Eastern Siberia, Mongolia and Kazakhstan. They are claimed to be from the 8th Century as “guards of burial sites” and “tombstones” of an “ancient turkic people”.
Valley of Balls
Torysh Valley Kazakhstan has thousands of balls strewn into the landscape, some of which are shown below.
What kind of technology might have been used to cut these balls into perfect slices? And why do some of the balls have another ball (different material and color) at their core?
What method was used to create these balls?
Reasonable Explanations by locals, historians, archaeologists and local authorities: ZERO.
Wikipedia’s page says that the “prevailing theory is that they are the product of various geological processes“.
Are the experts that stupid? No. But they think you are.
The precision cutting you see above is not the result of any “geological process”, nor is nature known for making round balls.
As with the native Americans, we also see numerous mounds in the region. This is “Mound 4 of the Eleke Sazy necropolis” in eastern Kazakhstan.
Melted Cities
The following photos are from the Mangystau region of Kazakhstan. The mountains are said to be natural formations, come about by millions of years of geological formation.
People such as myself, who see formerly artificial structures, are said to be suffering from Pareidolia. Says AI:
“Pareidolia is the human tendency to perceive meaningful patterns, especially faces, in random or ambiguous visual data, like seeing a face on the Moon, in clouds, or in toast; it’s an evolutionary shortcut where our brains, highly attuned to faces for social survival, over-interpret vague stimuli, linking them to familiar patterns from our past experiences, and is a form of apophenia, the broader tendency to find connections in unrelated things”
In previous articles I’ve shown evidence of similar forms having once been large scale buildings with doors, windows and pillars. The evidence for this in the Mangystau region is not as clear as elsewhere, so I can accept the accusation of Pareidolia.
Even so, let’s look at this region from the viewpoint of “massive, artificially made buildings that have been melted or destroyed by advanced weaponry”.
A closer look:
A closer look at this perfectly straight line cutting through the rock:
There are many carvings of glyphs in the area (as in the second image below) that defy modern understanding.
Hundreds of strange pillars, balls and statues (such as in image 1 below) also point toward the fact that we’re seeing the ruins of a destroyed ancient city.
The Mangystau region also hosts non-melted ancient ruins (as in images 2 and 4 below).
In the adjacent Aktobe region, the artificial-ness of the forms becomes clearer:
Take a close look at the photo above. Are we entirely sure I’m suffering from Pareidolia when I say these are artificially crafted buildings?
And if that’s still not obvious enough for you, here is the “Pyramid of Aktolagai”:
There is a head with clearly discernable facial features on top. Anyone still saying “Pareidolia”?
Officialdom actually admits that this particular structure is man-made. They claim, without a shred of evidence (again) that it’s 3400 years old, but offer little to explain who made it. But the other stepped-structures and pyramids of the area (see image above the last) are claimed to be “natural”. And if you say otherwise, you must be “suffering from Paraeidolia”.
The Pyramid is part of a larger complex called Aktolagay Plateau:
I doubt they’d ever acknowledge that this was once a massive city (even though ancient maps show large cities across the region).
Tartaria Disappeared
Before the late 1800s, Kazakhstan was a smaller part of a larger empire called Tartaria. This 1749 map says in German “a piece of greter Tartary”.
In 1851 it was still called “Independent Tartary”:
And yet the Wikipedia page on Kazakhstan makes ZERO mention of Tartartia in its History section.
Akmola
The capital of Kazakhstan is the city Astana. It’s probably no coincidence that Astana is an anagram of Satan, considering the symbolism of its modern layout and architecture and the fact that it’s second new name is “Nur Sultan” which means “King of Light”, a nod to Lucifer. I don’t know if this has any relation to ancient Kazakhstan.
Before it was named Astana, the city was called Akmola.
One of the many archaeological finds in the vicinity of Akmola on this photo:
The news said this about the finding:
“Mysterious stone carving depicting a human face found in Kazakhstan.
A recent survey by the Ministry of Emergency Situations has uncovered a mysterious stone carving depicting a human face in the Akmola Region of Kazakhstan.
The discovery was made in the Sandyktau district, where employees from the Emergency Situations Department found the depiction carved onto the face of a granite boulder.
The carving measures 27 by 21 cm and is oriented west-southwest. It was found alongside a nearby rock ceiling and a poorly preserved image of a deer.
Archaeologists suggest that the carving and rock ceiling were part of a ritual complex, the purpose of which is yet to be determined.
According to Yarygin Sergey from the Margulan Institute of Archaeology, the carving likely dates from the Bronze Age and has parallels with similar rock face carvings found in Bronze Age sites across Central Asia and Eastern Europe”.
Bronze Age? Why not Tartaria? In the course of years of research I have never seen any item ascribed to the Grand Empire of Tartary.
I became curious about the city of Akmola so I did a Google Search for “Akmola 1800s”. It brought up nothing, which is highly unusual. No picture, no painting, no drawing, nothing.
I typed the same in English into the Russian search engine Yandex and drew up next to nothing.
But then I typed the Russian spelling of the city, Акмолинск into Yandex Search and suddenly Akmola of the 1800s appeared.
Is it intentionally omitted from English-speaking Search Engines?
Akmola of the 1800s was more than just nomads wandering the steppes.
One again we find submerged buildings and unpaved streets.
In my previous article on old Russia, The Lost History of Irkutsk, I showed several half submerged buildings. I’ve shown similar around the world.
The number of explanations I received from Locals, Authorities or Historians: ZERO.
If these were supposed to have built in the 1800s, why do they look hundreds of years old? New place, same old questions.
In fact, I’d bet money that the building in the photo above was dug up out of the mud.
I found an English-language History website which claims that Kazakhstan of the 1800s was populated by nomadic “people of the steppes” who built their dwellings like this:
This kind of teaching puts a veil over one’s perception. If you’re led to believe that these were nothing but wandering nomads who were picking food off the bushes, you henceforth ignore the actual History of the area.
Almaty
Looking for photos of 1800s Almaty, the biggest city in Kazakhstan, I find photographic documentation of widespread destruction. It is claimed that this is derived from the 1887 Earthquake that destroyed old Almaty.
If you’ve been reading this website, you’re not at all surprised by this. I’ve talked about hundreds of old cities around the world and they all happened to experience some disasterous event – fire, war, floods and earthquakes or grand demolition in the 1800s.
However, take a close look at the 4th image above. This is not the result of an Earthquake but of the worldwide mud-flood. As elsewhere we see a submerged house and a street filled with rocks and shrubs, indicating that whatever happened here, happened a long time ago. And whatever the flood didn’t destroy was finished off with a later Earthquake (in my view).
Once again we find impressive architecture – not at all reminiscent of a “nomadic people of the steppe”, destroyed in the forgotten war and reset of the 1800s. Once again we find these buildings but no paved streets, instead dirt roads.
Conclusion
I don’t have ready-made answers or explanations to what really happened. But I can tell you with certainty that the official History is a lazily fabricated, makeshift farce that is meant to cover-up something much greater.